ai newsDo., 22. Okt.
EilmeldungYear-old AI research lab Flapping Airplanes raises $1B at a reported $6B valuation

Find your competitor's weak spots: export App Store and Google Play reviews and let AI sort the complaints

Before you build an app, the most useful research is free and public: what people hate about the apps that already exist. It sits in the 1- and 2-star reviews on the App Store and Google Play. The problem is getting it out. The stores show a few reviews at a time, Apple and Google format them diffe

dev.toMittwoch 23:50 · 21.10.4 Min. Lesezeit
Bild: dev.to

Before you build an app, the most useful research is free and public: what people hate about the apps that already exist. It sits in the 1- and 2-star reviews on the App Store and Google Play.

The problem is getting it out. The stores show a few reviews at a time, Apple and Google format them differently, and copy-pasting 2,000 reviews into a chat window is not a plan.

I'll use the App Store & Google Play Reviews Scraper on Apify. Disclosure: I built it. It takes App Store and Google Play links side by side and returns the same fields for both, which is what makes the AI step easy.

Plain IDs work too ( 1234567890, com.example.app ).

Every row looks the same, whichever store it came from:

{ "store": "googlePlay", "appName": "ChatGPT", "country": "us", "rating": 2, "title": null, "text": "Keeps logging me out after the last update...", "date": "2026-10-19T14:18:56", "appVersion": "1.2026.279", "thumbsUpCount": 14 } Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode rating, appVersion and thumbsUpCount are the useful columns: you can filter to low ratings, see which version broke something, and weight complaints by how many people agreed.

Limits to know: Apple only shares the latest 500 reviews per app, country and sort order. To get more from the App Store, add countries or run both sort orders. Google Play has no fixed limit.

You don't need 5-star "great app!!" reviews for this. In Google Sheets or Excel, filter rating to 1, 2 and 3. For a popular app, that's usually a few hundred rows, small enough for any AI chat.

import pandas as pd df = pd. read_csv ( " dataset.csv " ) bad = df [ df [ " rating " ] <= 3 ]. sort_values ( " thumbsUpCount ", ascending = False ) bad [[ " store ", " rating ", " appVersion ", " thumbsUpCount ", " title ", " text " ]]. to_csv ( " complaints.csv ", index = False ) print ( len ( bad ), " complaints saved " ) Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode Step 3: Let AI sort them Upload complaints.csv to Claude or ChatGPT and use a prompt like this:

These are 1-3 star reviews of [APP NAME] from the App Store and Google Play. 1. Group them into themes (bugs, pricing, missing features, UX, support...). 2. For each theme give: number of reviews, total thumbsUpCount, and 2 short quotes. 3. Rank themes by how painful and how common they are. 4. List the top 5 feature requests people explicitly ask for. 5. Note any theme that started after a specific appVersion. Be concrete. Do not invent reviews that are not in the file. Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode What you get back is a ranked map of the competitor's weak spots, with real quotes as evidence. The "started after version X" question often finds the best opportunities: users who were happy until an update broke something are actively looking for an alternative.

A few patterns that come up again and again:

Run the same export for 3-5 competing apps and compare the themes side by side. That's an afternoon of work instead of weeks of guessing.

The official apify-client package runs the same scraper from Python:

from apify_client import ApifyClient client = ApifyClient ( " YOUR_APIFY_TOKEN " ) run = client. actor ( " trendcraft/app-reviews-scraper " ). call ( run_input = { " apps ": [ " 389801252 ", " com.instagram.android " ], " countries ": [ " us ", " gb " ], " maxReviewsPerApp ": 500, " sort ": " newest ", }) reviews = list ( client. dataset ( run [ " defaultDatasetId " ]). iterate_items ()) print ( len ( reviews ), " reviews " ) Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode Cost, and when you don't need this Results are priced per review; the current price is on the Actor's Pricing tab. At the time of writing it is $0.25 per 1,000 reviews, so a 2,000-review study costs about fifty cents.

If you only need Google Play reviews and are comfortable with Python, the free google-play-scraper library works well. The Actor is useful when you want both stores in one format, several countries in one run, a scheduled daily export, or no code at all.

Questions or a missing field? Open an issue on the Actor's Issues tab.

This post was drafted with AI assistance; input names and output fields were checked against the Actor itself.

Quelle: dev.to (dev.to). Original öffnen