OpenAI's Ted Sanders shares a rule of thumb for picking the right GPT-model
OpenAI's Ted Sanders explains where GPT-6.1 Terra fits in the company's GPT lineup. The smaller model outperforms the larger Astra in technical communication and costs far less but trails it in most other areas. Sanders says model size, reasoning effort, and multi-agent systems are distinct dimensi

OpenAI's Ted Sanders has categorized the new GPT-6.1 Terra and explained how the company names its language models. According to Sanders, model performance is multidimensional. A model that's great at math won't automatically be good at jokes. Still, most performance gaps come down to one variable: model size. Sanders says OpenAI's model names are difficult to simplify because model size, reasoning effort, and multi-agent systems are distinct dimensions. Combining them into a single "IQ score" would obscure details.
And size doesn't explain everything. Newer, smaller models can outperform older, larger ones through better training data or improved architectures. GPT-6.1 Terra is likely better than the larger Astra at technical communication and roughly matches it in image processing and computer use at a much lower price point, but falls short in most other areas, Sanders says. "If you care about quality only, pick Astra. If you're a bit price sensitive, pick Sol. If you're very price sensitive, pick Terra or Luna."
Subscribe to THE DECODER for ad-free reading, a weekly AI newsletter, our exclusive "AI Radar" frontier report six times a year, full archive access, and access to our comment section.