Verified but Vacuous: Three Failure Surfaces of LLM-Driven Verified Code Generation
arXiv:2611.05590v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: What should ``verified'' mean when evaluating LLM-generated code? Many existing pipelines report a single verification number. We argue this collapses three distinct properties measured in a conditional audit sequence: verifier acceptance (Surface A),
Der Artikeltext wird beim nächsten Sync nachgeladen. Original bei arXiv cs.AI lesen
Quelle: arXiv cs.AI (arXiv cs.AI). Original öffnen